|
ManimalX -> RE: Sherlock Holmes Remake (8/5/2009 4:18:45 AM)
|
You have to be kidding me?!? I have been intrigued, fascinated, and entertained by Sir Doyle's Sherlock Holmes since I graduated from picture books to word books. When I found out Holmes was getting a big-budget film treatment, I was elated. ORIGINAL CONTENT REMOVED IN LIGHT OF A BIT OF RESEARCH *******************EDITED TO ADD: I'm not finding a lot of "gay" references in actual descriptions of the movie around the web. In fact, Kelly Reilly portrays the character Mary, Watson's love interest in the film. Rachel McAdams plays the same role to Depp's Holmes. I think Medved may have missed the boat on this one. I even scoured some gay sites to see what the homosexual community was thinking, and there is really no substantial evidence that Holmes and Watson engage in "gay" activity, save ONE comment by Downey Jr. earlier this year about "two men who live together, wrestle a lot and sometimes share a bed"... Here is a bit from gawker.com entitled "How Gay is Guy Ricthie's Sherlock Holmes?", from folks who actually read the movie script: quote:
http://gawker.com/5330061/how-gay-is-guy-ritchies-sherlock-holmes Well, we got a hold of a copy of a script to see just how gay it is, and to Medved's relief (or secret disappointment?) there's no scenes of Holmes and Watson going Brokeback. Our version is dated March 18, 2008, so it may not be the final, final revision. But the only explicit sex mentioned is a half-naked post-coital shot of Downey and Rachel McAdams in bed. That doesn't mean, of course, that Ritchie didn't direct his actors to give the Holmes-Watson dynamic some sexual tension. Here's the script's gayest moment — a scene that comes early in the movie when Watson tells Holmes that he's getting married. I could see how it could be played gay, but be your own judge. I don't know... it isn't outside of the realm of possibilities, but I don't see the money-men for this big budget film based upon a franchise that has been beloved world over for over 100 years almost guaranteeing a box-office flop by reinventing the main characters as homosexuals.
|
|
|
|